Released on: May 30, 2008, 9:05 pm

Press Release Author: Sean Sheeter

Industry: Education

Press Release Summary: Predictions of the most significant particle cascades at
CERN\'s LHC collider. Discusses how SUSY theory relates to a full Higgs mechanism
focusing on gluino decay to squarks as a prerequisite to creation of meutralino
\'dark mass,\' as well as the puzzle of material baryon creation. Also shows the
importance of giving three dimensionless equations for a precise given gluino mass
in a newly free introductory e-course from 241-Mumbers.

Press Release Body: This year the Large Hadron Collider at CERN will commence
operations. It's expected the LHC is capable of producing supersymmetric particles,
otherwise known as sparticles. While most sparticles are confined to a lesser
energy, any evidence of squarks will require a mass-energy equivalent to a gluino g^
= 6.388355 TeV.

By comparison, the first LHC runs may create a \'light Higgs boson,\' as evidenced by
CERNs electron collider in 2000. While it\'ll be ballyhooed as confirming the
\'standard Higgs-model,\' it is foolish if that was the point of the LHC; yet
vindicated by no present evidence for sparticles. Likewise, the lepton collider was
incapable of producing the raft of states encompassing the full supersymmetric Higgs
Mechanism, the heaviest of which imparts mass to gluinos. Which assures the real
interesting physics won't occur until the accelerator reaches higher relativistic
energies of focused proton/anti-proton collisions.

Yet just as gluino creation precedes its decay into squarks, it\'s also antecedent to
producing the lightest sparticle: the Higgs-fermion better known as a neutralino,
which constitutes galactic \'WIMP dark-mass.\' For what was referred to as \"the real
interesting physics\" reduces to a chain of transformational decays that further
accounts for the observed dominance of baryon matter over anti-matter in
baryogenesis: the creation of precursors to protons and neutrons. It follows that
gluinos represent the most important, though rather misunderstood, state of the
sparticle-particle spectrum.

For there\'s more to super-symmetry than simply regarding a sparticle as a heavier
state of some fundamental particle with Fermi-Bose inverted-spin. For example, a
quark carries a fractional charge whose nature as a fermion demands existence of an
anti-quark of opposite charge. A squark, however, is a boson of integer-spin whose
charge ultimately is determined by the \'first-generation\' of the +2e/3 Up or -1e/3
Down \'family\' to which it belongs. So while the up is the lightest quark, sUp is the
heaviest squark owing to an \'inverted flavor hierarchy\' where the heaviest top quark
corresponds to the lightest sTop squark. Yet more importantly, it\'s the bose nature
of squarks that enforces the Absence of an identifiable fermi-like state of
antimatter: -2/3-charged squarks simply don\'t exist. So a neutral gluino strongly
decays into a either a U-squark with two lighter sBottoms, or two D-squarks with,
say, a sCharm.

Hence it\'s rather easy to imagine how a fixed squark charge from gluino decay is a
prerequisite for material baryogenesis. There's more to this conclusion of course,
but the explanation here rather simply conveys its essence. And though a few models
have been proposed which seem to accord with these ideas, there\'s little evidence
any argument has effectively challenged the notoriously inadequate explanation of
baryogenesis in terms other than some variant of [CP] \"symmetry violations\" from a
dense meson-like quark-antiquark/gluon plasma: hardly \'stable matter.\' For theorists
to then acknowledge neutralino dark-mass, but not baryon-matter, as representing the
\"resultant purpose of SUSY\" -creating a viable world like we occupy- is beyond
comprehension.

Still, it\'s fair to question 1: what justifies criticizing established precedents of
better minds beyond 2: merely making unconfirmed \"claims\" of calculating gluino
mass. In regards to the former critique, one can only say no other 'authority'
provides an effective explanation for baryon-creation. For the \'241-model\' further
predicts a precise percentage of baryons relative to the total critical universal
mass that's in fine accord with observation; supposedly mere \"coincidence\"
otherwise.

Yet it is critique-2 that garners emphasis as a follow-up to a review
http://www.pr.com/press-release/69740 of key discoveries. In this regard,
gluino-mass is first of four Sample Data and Proofs on the 241mumbers website, as
well as before the textbook\'s introduction. Two of these other examples constitute
\"pudding proofs\" that empirically, as well as theoretically, confirm the precise
mass of the down and up quarks, as well as the strange and bottom. While gluino mass
presently lacks LHC-confirmation; it still entails a hard proof that\'s rather
mathematical and experiential. For giving just the mass-value urges serious readers
to "eat the pudding themselves\" as an initial \'hands-on task.\' Which is to formulate
three dimensionless equations as ratios to other masses in an abbreviated particle
table following the introduction.

For the preceding report argues that listing dimensionless ratios between metric
parameters is meaningless unless one is able to Write a Predictive, purely-mumeric,
Equation. If three independent equations exist relating to one energy, a being could
cogently conclude it\'s the only possible answer even without experimental data
\'backing the claim.\' For in this pudding, proof is in your bowl. Yet for the six
years this material\'s been on the web, everyone tested has flunked; nobody\'s
supplied one equation, let alone three. Since 241-Mumbers\' purpose remains best
tested in an educational forum, it announces indefinite postponement of publication
in favor of a free invitation to the introductory e-course in which one might earn
full access to a raft of unprecedented information.

Web Site: http://www.241mumbers.com

Contact Details: ssheets@241mumbers.com
Sean Sheeter
760-727-7508
241 Mumbers, PO Box 322
San Marcos, CA 92079-0322